"THE United States is abandoning its role as the global
champion of human rights.
Revelations that top officials are targeting
people to be assassinated abroad, including American citizens, are only the
most recent, disturbing proof of how far our nation’s violation of human rights
has extended. This development began after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, and has been sanctioned and escalated by bipartisan executive and
legislative actions, without dissent from the general public. As a result, our
country can no longer speak with moral authority on these critical issues.
While the country has made mistakes in the past, the
widespread abuse of human rights over the last decade has been a dramatic
change from the past. With leadership from the United States, the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in 1948 as “the foundation
of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” This was a bold and clear commitment
that power would no longer serve as a cover to oppress or injure people, and it
established equal rights of all people to life, liberty, security of person,
equal protection of the law and freedom from torture, arbitrary detention or
forced exile.
The declaration has been invoked by human rights
activists and the international community to replace most of the world’s
dictatorships with democracies and to promote the rule of law in domestic and
global affairs. It is disturbing that, instead of strengthening these
principles, our government’s counterterrorism policies are now clearly
violating at least 10 of the declaration’s 30 articles, including the
prohibition against “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
Recent legislation has made legal the president’s
right to detain a person indefinitely on suspicion of affiliation with
terrorist organizations or “associated forces,” a broad, vague power that can
be abused without meaningful oversight from the courts or Congress (the law is
currently being blocked by a federal judge). This law violates the right to
freedom of expression and to be presumed innocent until proved guilty, two
other rights enshrined in the declaration.
In addition to American citizens’ being targeted for
assassination or indefinite detention, recent laws have canceled the restraints in the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to allow unprecedented violations of our
rights to privacy through warrantless wiretapping and government mining of our
electronic communications. Popular state laws permit detaining individuals
because of their appearance, where they worship or with whom they associate.
Despite an arbitrary rule that any man killed by
drones is declared an enemy terrorist, the death of nearby innocent women and
children is accepted as inevitable. After more than 30 airstrikes on civilian
homes this year in Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai has demanded that such
attacks end, but the practice continues in areas of Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen
that are not in any war zone. We don’t know how many hundreds of innocent
civilians have been killed in these attacks, each one approved by the highest
authorities in Washington. This would have been unthinkable in previous times.
These policies clearly affect American foreign policy.
Top intelligence and military officials, as well as rights defenders in
targeted areas, affirm that the great escalation in drone attacks has turned
aggrieved families toward terrorist organizations, aroused civilian populations
against us and permitted repressive governments to cite such actions to justify
their own despotic behavior.
Meanwhile, the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, now houses 169 prisoners.
About half have been cleared for release, yet have little prospect of ever
obtaining their freedom. American authorities have revealed that, in order to
obtain confessions, some of the few being tried (only in military courts) have
been tortured by waterboarding more than 100 times or intimidated with
semiautomatic weapons, power drills or threats to sexually assault their
mothers. Astoundingly, these facts cannot be used as a defense by the accused,
because the government claims they occurred under the cover of “national
security.” Most of the other prisoners have no prospect of ever being charged
or tried either.
At a time when popular revolutions are sweeping the
globe, the United States should be strengthening, not weakening, basic rules of
law and principles of justice enumerated in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. But instead of making the world safer, America’s violation of
international human rights abets our enemies and alienates our friends.
As concerned citizens, we must persuade Washington to
reverse course and regain moral leadership according to international human
rights norms that we had officially adopted as our own and cherished throughout
the years."
Jimmy Carter, the 39th president, is the founder of
the Carter Center and the recipient of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize. A version of this op-ed
appeared in print on June 25, 2012, on page A19 of the New York edition with
the headline: A Cruel and Unusual Record.
Posts
