In 2005, again in 2007, and then again in 2010, I wrote on this issue, defending the use
 of controlled substances by sports figures...not a popular position 
then, and probably no more popular now.  Like so many aspects of our 
schizophrenic culture, what is done in private is one thing, but what 
we self-righteously say in public is supposed to be something else 
entirely.  Well, I don't play that game.
Right now, Lance Armstrong is in the trigger hairs of the media, which is frothing at the mouth to tear down yet another hero.  It is a repetitive story in our culture: build up a hero, then tear them down (often followed by some semblance of public redemption).  
I will not defend Lance because 'everyone does it' or because his foundation did such a wonderful job.
I defend Lance because its time to re-examine - and overthrow - the "reefer-Madness" opposition to Performance Enhancing Drugs ("PEDs").  I actually SUPPORT their use.
In 2007, the New
 York Times reported, “…Former Sen. Mitchell's 300-plus page document on
 performance-enhancing drugs in baseball, 21 months in the making, 
claims that nearly 90 players -- most notably Roger Clemens, Andy 
Pettitte, Barry Bonds, Gary Sheffield and Miguel Tejada -- are guilty of
 using some form of PEDs.”  The 
indictment of Roger Clemens for allegedly lying to Congress is the next 
step in 'getting those guys' when they can't produce the evidence to 
convict on the original case.  It's the Get-Martha-Stewart approach to 
justice.
When Mark Magwire was hounded by the press for using 
Androstendione ( a substance that was legal and sold over the counter in
 Golds Gyms, GNCs, and Drug Stores across America), it was easy to point
 the finger at “One Bad Guy.” When Barry Bonds was fingered as a steroid
 user, the writers at Sports Illustrated (sports nuts who cant play, but
 who delight in the catty process of creating legends and then 
destroying them) frothed at the mouth, issue after issue, because they 
could crucify One Bad Guy.
But now that steroids have appeared in
 major league baseball across the spectrum of time and teams, (as well as wrestling, football, basketball, and cycling) 
prosecutors can have a field day.
In 2005 I wrote:
“…Sitting
 on my shelf is a bottle of ProLab ThermaPro, a thermogenic designed to 
raise metabolism and help burn fat. I used this (same basic ingredients 
as the original Hydroxycut and Xenadrine) several summers ago, while 
running in the hot  sun every morning while trying to lose weight 
and tone up (mission: successful!). Ah, but this product contains 
ephedrine!!! [crowd gasps in horror in the background.] When I used it 
in 2002, I was using a sports supplement. When the FDA banned it in 
2004, I became the possessor of an illegal substance. When the Court 
overturned the FDA ban, I was an upstanding citizen again. Then the FDA 
declared that my 20 mg ephedrine was greater than the amount in the 
court case, and was illegal, and presto-chango, I’m a criminal again.
And
 this has been the history of steroids and sports supplements. The 
non-steroidal Androstendione which was available in every health and 
vitamin store a few years ago, all of a sudden disappeared because the 
FDA arbitrarily decided that since it was only “one step away” from a 
steroid, it is now illegal. However, DHEA, which is two 
chemical steps away from a steroid, is still OK.  The steroids that Jose
 "save-my-own-ass" Canseco mentioned being used in MLB were by and large
 completely legal in 1980. Many of them are still legal in much of the 
world, including industrialized nations such as Germany and Holland. 
Some (Fina) can be made of 100% legal substances in a kitchen. Others 
are legal as veterinary substances. And a great deal comes into this 
country from upstanding American soldier-heroes, who discover that the 
rest of the developed world doesnt have the knee-jerk Prohibitionist 
response that America has.
The history of Sports is the history 
of going the extra mile and being slightly better than anyone and 
everyone else. Athletes give up much of their personal lives and incur a
 great personal cost in training. They regulate what they eat. They pound back protein shakes.They take
 vitamin supplements such as Calcium. They take Glutamine to prevent 
muscle breakdown. They take Milk Thistle and ALA to keep their livers 
healthy. They take Glucosomine to help repair their stressed joints, and
 if they’re in trouble, they get shots of Cortisone from their doctors. 
Some take “stacks” to raise metabolism and speed weight-loss (like my 
illegal aspirin-caffeine-ephedrine stack). They use Creatine as a muscle
 volumizer and NO2 to increase muscle pump, while downing extra-heavy 
whey-protein isolate shakes to increase food to muscle cells. Somewhere 
along the line Congress is going to find out that many use insulin to 
increase food nutrition entering the muscle cells as well. Some use 
2-step-away prohormones like DHEA, others used 1-step-away-prohormones.
And yes, some use steroids. And the line between what is a legal substance to use, and what is an illegal substance, is arbitrary and artificial.
Yes,
 the bar is constantly raised. In the effort to be bigger, better, 
stronger, greater. And if anyone thinks that taking steroids means you 
take a pill and you’re suddenly Hulk, they are sadly misinformed. Guys 
who take steroid injections and just ‘wait’ for the effects find 
themselves fat and tired. An athlete who has chosen to use steroids will
 be working his butt off 5-6 days a week in grueling workouts. There is 
no ‘free ride’ by using steroids.
It is amazing, isn’t 
it? If someone goes to Beverly Hills and forks over $10,000 to a surgeon
 to have 40 pounds of lard sucked out of their gut in a two-hour 
operation, that is not only legal, it’s indicative of being One of the 
Beautiful People. But if you work your tail off during a 12-week steroid
 cycle to reduce your body fat from 15% to 6% through arduous workouts, 
well…..”that’s illegal! That’s immoral! That’s just not right!!!! We 
must punish baseball players! Lance is a cheat!”
Actually, it seems a hell of a lot more honest to me. Of course, why stop at baseball players, or with Lance? 
Does
 anyone really believe that the models on the cover of Mens fitness 
magazines get that way from situps and spinach? Have they asked the 
Governor of California how he got that big? 
Wake up, folk: when 
you outlaw a substance, you don’t make it go away…you make it go 
underground, and you increase the danger of its being tainted. Anyone 
remember Prohibition?
What’s more important, is that no one has 
been able to tell me just who is so harmed by an individual athlete’s 
choice to juice that it requires federal robocops. Have these sports 
figures killed anyone? Assaulted anyone? Robbed anyone? Maimed anyone? 
Can you point to any damage they have caused? 
There are those 
who will say that when young people emulate these guys, they are hurt. 
But that’s like saying that NASCAR should be responsible for kids who 
drive fast, that McDonalds should be responsible for obese slobs who sit
 and eat Big Macs every day, and that Clint Eastwood should be 
responsible for a kid who shoots someone.
If the Players are 
upset, or the union, or the fans, or the owners, they have immediate 
remedies and avenues. If they have chosen not to pursue them, perhaps 
Congress should realize they’re barking up the wrong tree. We don’t need
 Congress to decide who should be and shouldn’t be our sports heroes. 
We’ll do that for ourselves, thank you.
Glitter, Ghouls, and Freedom
                      -
                    
 
Halloween has long been a favorite holiday among the LGBTQ+ community — and 
not just because we throw some of the best parties. There’s something 
deeper...
8 hours ago

 
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
